How we compare ourselves to other panels.
Our homepage compares Resimi against the average of 15 audited panels. A comparison with no published method is just an advert, so here is the method — including the competitor that scored higher than us, and the parts of our own score we are not happy with.
Who was audited
Fifteen panels, on 2026-07-01. Chosen by search visibility and community mentions for the head terms in this market, not by whether they flattered the result:
How it was done
- 2026-07-01 — All 15 homepages opened live and scored on a 7-dimension rubric. Then all 15 logged-in dashboards were reviewed, so the scores reflect the product a paying customer actually uses, not just the marketing page.
- 2026-07-14 — The top 7 were re-audited in depth, and Resimi was scored on the same rubric in the same pass. This matters: an internal self-assessment scored Resimi far higher, and it was discarded, because it had not been graded against the same rubric as everyone else.
- 2026-07-23 — The top 5 were walked again live, landing page and real dashboard, to check feature claims against the working product rather than against their own copy.
The rubric, and Resimi's own scores
| Dimension | Resimi | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| Design & UX | 9/10 | Layout, density, whether the interface reads as a professional tool. |
| Pricing transparency | 9/10 | Is the full price list public, ungated, and the same list you order from. |
| Trust | 6.5/10 | Third-party review volume and rating, scanner reputation, operator disclosure. |
| Support | 7/10 | Channels available, whether tickets reach a human, measurable responsiveness. |
| Feature depth | 8/10 | Per-service data, order safety, bulk tools, reseller and API surface. |
| SEO & content | 7/10 | Indexed footprint, blog volume, language and country coverage. |
| Beginner education | 7/10 | Whether a first-time buyer is guided or left to guess. |
Where that put us
Second of eight, on the 2026-07-14 rescore. Followiz scored above us, and the reason is specific: it shows live per-service drop rate, reliability and start time to buyers, and it has far more third-party reviews than we do.
| Panel | Overall |
|---|---|
| Followiz | 8.00 |
| Resimi (us) | 7.64 |
| SMM World | 7.43 |
| EasyToPromo | 6.86 |
| Peakerr | 6.71 |
| Smmwiz | 6.57 |
| SmmFollows | 6.00 |
| JustAnotherPanel | 5.29 |
The two scores we are weakest on, and why
- Trust — 6.5. Our Trustpilot rating is good but the sample is small. A high rating on a handful of reviews is not the same evidence as a similar rating on two hundred, and we are not going to pretend otherwise. We also do not publish a registered company identity, which costs us here.
- Support — 7. Ticketing works end to end and reaches a human, but we have no measured average response time to publish yet, so we do not claim one.
Limitations you should hold against this
- We ran this audit ourselves. It is not an independent third-party review, and you should read it with that in mind.
- Reputation figures came from search-engine snapshots of review and scanner sites, not from reading every review. Treat them as directional.
- Scores are point-in-time. This market moves fast: between two audit rounds two weeks apart, four of the seven panels we re-checked had picked up fresh, independently reported reputation problems.
- Automated trust scanners penalise almost any young, privacy-registered, crypto-accepting panel in this category — including us. We are not going to cite our own scanner score as a positive, and we would treat any competitor citing theirs the same way.
- Starting-price comparisons are not like-for-like unless the same service is being compared. Where a competitor does not publish a starting price, we say "not published" rather than estimating one.
Check it yourself
Every claim we make about our own product is verifiable without an account: the full price list is public and ungated, the tier and refill status of every service is on the listing, and Drop Radar aggregates the whole catalog live.
Full public price list →
Drop Radar — live catalog tier split →
What happens if it goes wrong →
Per-competitor comparisons →
Audit rounds: 2026-07-01 (15 panels, landing + dashboard), 2026-07-14 (top 7 rescored with Resimi on the same rubric), 2026-07-23 (top 5 re-walked live). Competitor names are trademarks of their respective owners and are used here for identification and comparison only.